Monday, November 9, 2009
Men in White Coats
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Gross!
Friday, July 24, 2009
Sometimes, You Can't Stop the Crazy
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
You Know You're Not Fooling Anyone, Right?
She's bossy and mean. He's weak and boring.
Together they produced a hell of a lot of kids.
Snooze.
But, how can you stay away from the media storm the break up of their marriage is creating? It's salacious. It's fame, sex, money and lies. It's awesome.
In an, 'oh those poor children' kind of way, but awesome, nonetheless.
They're trying to convince us they're still together.
Yet, they spent her birthday apart. His trip out to Utah "just happened" to fall on her birthday?
I call bullshit on that one. You don't just happen to make other plans on your wife's birthday. This is a major relationship no-no. You especially don't make other plans to hang out with a girl you got tabloid busted for possibly having an affair.
There is trying to convince us that you're still together for the sake of the show and blah, blah, blah, whatever. Then, there is insulting.
Really, the hard part to believe is that someone would want to have an affair with either one of them. They've got 8 kids. If I were single, I don't think that kids would be a deal breaker. One or two little steps running around seems like it would be manageable. But, eight? That's a whole lot of baggage. I guess you can never really underestimate how low people are willing to sink for a little bit of fame-whore action.
Who's ya daddy?
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
What a Waste
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Sick and Wrong
FORT BRAGG, North Carolina - Staff Sgt. Jason Jonas says when he goes to bed at night, he is terrified his medication will cause him to oversleep and miss morning roll call again.
His commanders are fully aware the paratrooper wounded in Afghanistan has been diagnosed with a sleep disorder, because he is one of about 10,000 soldiers assigned to the Army's Warrior Transition units, created for troops recovering from injuries.
Instead of gingerly nursing them back to health, however, commanders at Fort Bragg's transition unit readily acknowledge holding them to the same standards as able-bodied soldiers in combat units, often assigning chores as punishment for minor infractions.
In fact, the unit has a discipline rate three times as high as Fort Bragg's main tenant, the 82nd Airborne Division, and transition units at two other bases punish their soldiers even more frequently than the one at Fort Bragg, according to an Associated Press review of records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.
"In my 10 years of service I have often seen soldiers mistreated, abused or left hanging, but never have I seen an entire unit collectively mentally and physically break down its members," said Jonas, a 28-year-old from Tempe, Arizona.
Adding insult to injury
Jonas is one of 11 current or former soldiers who have spent time in Fort Bragg's transition unit and say that its officers are either indifferent to their medical needs or trying to drive injured men and women from the military. Some complain they are being punished for the very injuries that landed them in the unit."It is the military's way of dealing with it: `You're a fake. You need to go back to work,'" said Pfc. Roman Serpik, 25, who enlisted in Duluth, Georgia. He said he injured his head and back in a practice parachute jump last April.
Jonas suffered a concussion on a jump in 1999 at Fort Bragg, and military doctors determined that that led him to develop narcolepsy, a disorder that causes people to fall asleep abruptly, he said. He provided copies of his medical profile to the AP to confirm he has the disorder.
He said medication for his condition made him miss formation five times, resulting in a demotion that cost him $400 a month.
Officers in the transition battalion at Fort Bragg's Womack Army Medical Center would not discuss individual soldiers' medical or disciplinary records, citing privacy laws. Speaking generally, they said the way to get soldiers back on their feet is discipline, not accepting excuses.
"Do we hold our capable warriors in transition accountable to these standards, to include the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the various Army regulations? Unapologetically, yes, we do," said Lt. Col. Jay Thornton, the unit's commander.
Thornton said soldiers are "helped, not harmed, by maintaining an appropriate level of structure and military discipline."
Advocates for wounded soldiers question whether the tough-love approach is an effort to get rid of soldiers considered unlikely to return to regular duty.
"It creates a hostile environment where soldiers buckle and take a low-balled disability rating and benefits just to get out when they can," said retired Army Lt. Col. Mike Parker.
The Warrior Transition system was established two years ago to improve treatment of wounded soldiers after the scandal over shoddy conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.Soldiers assigned to the units have combat injuries such as amputations and mental health problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder, as well as minor ailments that didn't come from combat.
The transition unit at Fort Bragg issued what is known as an Article 15 — used for minor misconduct that doesn't rise to the level of a court-martial — roughly once a month for every 135 soldiers through the first nine months of 2008.
At Fort Knox, Kentucky, the rate was even higher — one Article 15 per month for every 96 soldiers. The highest rate was at Fort Drum, New York, home to the 10th Mountain Division, where the injured warriors' commanders issued one Article 15 per month for every 76 soldiers.On the more lenient end, the Article 15 rate for the transition battalion at Fort Riley in Kansas, home of the 1st Infantry Division, was one for every 309 soldiers, and one for every 371 soldiers in the transition unit at Hawaii's Schofield Barracks, the base of the 25th Infantry Division.
Flawed Army policy?
The differences in the discipline rates point to a flaw in policy rather than pockets of misbehaving soldiers, said Paul Rieckhoff, founder and executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America."We will be looking to the Army to take swift action and hold the appropriate people accountable," he said.
Commanders at the transition units at Forts Knox and Riley and at Schofield Barracks all declined to comment on how they handle discipline. At Fort Drum, spokeswoman Kate Agresti said only that the base's transition battalion "follows appropriate military guidelines" that take a soldier's medical condition into account.
Jaime Cavazos, a spokeswoman with the Army Medical Command, declined to speculate on why the rate of Article 15s in the units differs so widely. "I suspect you'd find similar variances between line units throughout the Army," Cavazos said.
The current and former soldiers interviewed by the AP told similar stories about discipline within the unit at Fort Bragg. Most spoke on condition of anonymity because of fear of reprisal and warnings from above not to speak with reporters.
Sgt. Sheree Snow, 30, of Indianapolis, said she was evacuated from Iraq to Germany with fibroid tumors in February 2008, had a hysterectomy that May and was prescribed pain and sleeping medication for months afterward while at Fort Bragg. She said the medication led her to miss nine morning formations, and when she was trying to wean herself off the painkillers, an entire day.
Thornton, her commander, punished her with 14 days of extra duty and docked her two months' pay, she said.
"The leadership isn't trained to work with wounded soldiers," said Snow, who returned to her primary assignment at Fort Eustis, Virginia, this year. "I feel that the unit holds us to such high standards because they do not know better."
Jason Thomasson, a 34-year-old Iraq veteran from Winston-Salem, North Carolina, said he was sent to the unit after developing post-traumatic stress disorder, which he said led to extreme paranoia. He missed formations and left Fort Bragg without permission. For that he was demoted and eventually kicked out of the Army.
"Solders are being punished for injuries that they sustained while they were defending the nation," Thomasson said. "I was a model soldier before I had PTSD."
Chicken Little
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Headline
Rumors: Ocho Cinco says Crazy Things
Um, dude wanted to change his name legally to Ocho Cinco.
I don't think it's a "rumor" that he says crazy things.
Dude might just be crazy.
Friday, September 26, 2008
Craazy!!
Honest to Pete, I get what they are saying as an organization and I even agree with some of it.
(I
But, it seems to me that they are often more about grabbing attention in the headlines for themselves than about protecting animals.
Yeah, breast milk ice cream. That sounds just wonderful.
If Ben and Jerry's wanted to commit financial suicide, maybe they could consider doing that.
I'm sure they think they are PR savvy when they pull stunts like this, but honestly I think it hurts their cause more than it helps it.
Again, I'm sympathetic to their cause. But, even if I were to give up meat and leather tomorrow I wouldn't join PETA because they are crazy.
And I wouldn't join the crusade against cow's milk either. The husband's parents ran a dairy farm until very recently (when they passed it down to the husband's brother). I can't speak for all dairy farms, but the cows on this farm weren't mistreated or abused.
You might be able to convince me that a lot of things are wrong with the way we treat animals, but milking a cow? Probably not.
If PETAs end game involves recruiting a large number of zealots to their organization, but turning off everyone else who isn't interested in the crazy shit they pull, then job well done.
If their goal is actually to protect animals, then maybe they want to think about knocking it off with the stunts and spend their money where it will actually do some good.
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Oddest Drive By Comment
As we were walking down the street together, a dude leaned out his car window and shouted, "You stole that dog."
What?
Huh?
Alrighty, I guess.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
That's Weak, Mr. Senator
John needs to nap a little more.
As John McCain speaks out on more reform in Washington DC, he is now going to put in “new” regulations to protect us from the financial abuses that has led to the recent financial meltdown. The Senator is on top on his game. Here is a quote from a speech today (September 16, 2008):
“Americans put a lot of trust in the bankers and brokerage firms of Wall Street. They depend on the financial service sector to protect their savings, IRA's, 401k's, and pension accounts. But many leaders in finance have proven unworthy of that trust. Government has a clear responsibility to act in defense of the public interests, and that is exactly what I intend to do. We are going to make sure that American's accounts are protected. I pledge that FDIC and SPIC will have all the support they need to fully back the savings of the American people.”
(Here is a link to the rest of the speech)
A couple of problems here John.
1) It is SIPC not SPIC and either way they are NOT regulators they are INSURERS! Palin may not know what the Bush Doctrine is, but even she knows it is SIPC (I hope). BTW, he said SPIC in three different speeches today.
(Also, SPIC is an ethnic slur used for a person of Hispanic descent. Although I doubt McCain meant it that way, it makes the speech more interesting... AND I doubt if Palin knows what SIPC is.)
2) John, you have been in Washington for how many years? Were you not there when the regulations were taken apart? Isn’t Phil Gramm still one of your top advisors? You know the Phil Gramm that led the charge to remove most of the depression era Glass-Steagall Act regulations that were SPECIFICALLY designed to prevent the types of abuses we are experiencing now. Senators, how did you vote:
a. McCain – Yea
b. Biden - Nay
c. Feingold – Nay (Just had to throw a little bone to the fine Wisconsin Senator)
Scarily enough, McCain has hinted that Gramm might become the Treasury secretary if elected. Ewww!!
These two articles talk about McCain's flip-flop on the regulation of Wall Street:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9246.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26749280/
Also scary, this quote from John McCain in March, "I'm always for less regulation." AND "I'd like to see a lot of the unnecessary government regulations eliminated."
We are in SO much trouble if this man is elected!!
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Who brought a knife to the party?
WTF?
No seriously, WTF?
Normally, I would make some snarky comments here, but is it even really necessary?
There's no sport in shooting fish in a barrel.
